Tradeoffs to Article Selection under SFDR: Navigating Compliance for Fund Managers
We recently had the privilege of hosting Jenny Overman, Associate Director of Privium Fund Management, at Treety’s SFDR-themed webinar where she shared her experiences navigating the complexities of this new regulation. Jenny provided valuable insight on the tradeoffs of selecting the right Article for fund managers in Europe that are obligated to comply. This article sheds light on some key takeaways from our discussion last week.
From left to right: Katia Nicolas, Hatim Baheranwala, and Jenny Overman during the SFDR-themed webinar held on May 24th, 2023 at Treety HQ.
The Guiding Principles under SFDR:
SFDR is driven by the overarching goal of helping mature sustainable finance practices and formally integrating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors into investment decisions. As part of a larger set of regulations proposed via the EU Green Deal, the SFDR regulation encourages financial market participants to align their investments with sustainable objectives, contributing to the transition to a greener and more sustainable economy. Guiding principles include the promotion of transparency and comparability between funds on the topic of sustainability/ESG, the prevention of greenwashing, and the provision of reliable information to investors to ultimately drive more capital toward sustainable investments. Ultimately, SFDR's disclosure requirements guide financial market participants in how they present their funds externally, enabling investors to make informed decisions aligned with their sustainability preferences.
Key Considerations for a Fund:
Before deciding which Article to select under SFDR, fund managers should carefully consider several key factors.
Firstly, it is crucial to engage with stakeholders, including Limited Partners (LPs), to understand their sustainability preferences and requirements. This ensures that the chosen Article appropriately reflects the fund's commitment to sustainable finance and aligns with investor expectations.
Fund managers should also be realistic about their ESG capabilities and resources, considering the feasibility of meeting the requirements of each Article. Starting with a lower Article type and progressively upgrading over time is often a prudent approach, allowing for a more seamless transition towards higher sustainability standards. Below is a recap of some key considerations to take into account when starting the SFDR compliance process for your fund:
Investment Strategy and Focus: Assessing the fund's investment strategy and focus is crucial when determining the appropriate Article. Consider whether the fund's investment objectives align more closely with achieving a specific environmental and/or social outcome (Article 9). Funds can also consider ESG while still maintaining a financial objective (Article 8), or be primarily financial-driven (Article 6). Aligning the Article selection with the fund's core investment strategy ensures coherence and credibility in promoting sustainability.
ESG Integration Capabilities: Evaluate the fund's existing ESG integration capabilities, including data availability, expertise, and resources. Choosing an Article that aligns with the fund's current ESG practices and capabilities helps ensure a realistic and achievable compliance process. It is essential to select an Article that can be consistently maintained and substantiated with reliable ESG data and analysis. Higher Articles generally require more extensive data collection, reporting, and verification processes, which can be more resource-intensive and costly. Assess the fund's capacity to allocate resources, both in terms of financial investment and personnel, to meet the chosen Article's requirements effectively.
Market Differentiation: Consider the competitive landscape and market positioning. Selecting a higher Article (e.g., Article 9) can differentiate the fund from competitors and attract investors seeking more stringent sustainable investment options. Conversely, choosing a lower Article (e.g., Article 8) may be more suitable if the fund's sustainability practices align with industry norms, allowing for easier market positioning.
Specific Investor Requests: Assess the preferences and demands of the fund's current and potential investors, especially any anchor investor. Conducting investor surveys or engaging in discussions with stakeholders can provide valuable insights into their sustainability expectations and preferences. This information helps align the fund's Article selection with investor demands, enhancing transparency and meeting market expectations.
Regulatory Environment: Consider the evolving regulatory landscape and potential future updates to SFDR. While making an Article selection, it is important to anticipate potential regulatory changes and ensure flexibility to adapt to future requirements. Remaining up-to-date with regulatory developments helps ensure ongoing compliance and reduces the risk of needing to make substantial changes to the fund's Article selection in the future.
By considering these additional factors alongside the key considerations mentioned above, fund managers can make well-informed decisions about the appropriate Article to select under SFDR, taking into account their fund's unique characteristics, capabilities, and market positioning.
Pros & Cons: The Tradeoff per Article type under SFDR
Under SFDR classification, a fund can be labeled as Article 6, 8, or 9, according to the following characteristics:
Article 6 – Funds that are primarily financially driven.
Article 8 – Funds that promote environmental or social characteristics.
Article 9 – Funds that have sustainable investment as their objective.
Article 9 Funds:
Article 9 funds require 100% of ‘sustainable’ investments defined, and are appropriate for funds with overall environmental and/or social objectives.
Pros
Strong commitment to sustainable finance, demonstrating leadership in ESG integration.
Access to a growing pool of environmentally or socially conscious investors.
Potential long-term competitive advantage in the evolving sustainable finance market.
Cons
Resource-intensive and challenging to meet the rigorous requirements of Article 9.
Limited pool of eligible investments, potentially reducing investment opportunities.
Potential for accusations of greenwashing if the fund does not consistently meet stringent criteria.
Article 8 Funds:
Article 8 funds, also known as "light green" funds, focus on promoting environmental or social ‘characteristics’ without explicitly making an environmental or social impact as their primary objective. These funds play a crucial role in driving ESG integration within the financial sector and providing investors with sustainable options.
Pros
Demonstrates a commitment to sustainable finance, while providing a higher degree of flexibility as compared to Article 9.
Access to investors seeking consideration of ESG factors.
Opportunity to distinguish the fund from conventional funds, and attract socially conscious investors.
Cons
Challenges in differentiating from other Article 8 funds, since there is a wide spectrum of ESG integration strategies.
Limitations in marketing for the fund - EU regulators are considering limitations on the use of terms around ‘Impact’ or ‘Sustainability’ for Article 8 funds with a low threshold of Sustainable investments.
Requirements for transparency and disclosure still apply, which will require resource allocation to compliance and impact reporting.
Article 6 Funds:
Although Article 6 funds are categorized as not considering ESG criteria, they are still subject to some disclosure obligations, as well as internal consideration of sustainability risks. However, they cannot market or position themselves as having any ‘ESG’ or ‘Sustainable’ investment criteria.
Pros
The default Article type is suitable for funds that do not fall under Article 8 or Article 9. This article is assumed to be applied to any fund that has not yet made additional disclosures under Article 8 or 9.
Minimal compliance and disclosure obligations.
Cons
Is seen as a lower level of sustainability commitment compared to Article 8 and Article 9 funds, and therefore will invite questions in an increasingly sustainability-minded LP community.
Potential limitations in attracting investors seeking ESG or sustainability-linked investment options.
No possibility to brand or market funds with mention of any ESG or sustainability-linked criteria.
Takeaways:
Complying with SFDR and selecting the appropriate Article for your fund requires careful consideration and an understanding of the regulation's core principles. By engaging with stakeholders, being realistic about ESG capabilities, and upgrading over time, fund managers can define a credible & realistic pathway, that aligns with investor expectations and internal sustainability goals. Whether opting for Article 9, Article 8, or Article 6, each category has its advantages and tradeoffs. Ultimately, the selected Article should reflect the fund's commitment to sustainable finance while considering the resources and expertise necessary to meet the associated requirements.
Need support in defining the best compliance approach and article selection for your fund?
We’re here to help. Treety works with legal and ESG experts to simplify and automate reporting processes, turning hundreds of pages of legal texts into templated forms and data collection systems.
